The ‘Group Chief Executive’s
Business Review’ sets out clearly how HSBC
delivered a much improved balance of profits in
2010. It is reassuring to see our Personal
Financial Services businesses returning to
profitability in aggregate and Commercial
Banking growing significantly, largely in
emerging markets. These achievements augmented
another year of strong performance in Global
Banking and Markets.
Earnings per share improved strongly, rising by
115 per cent to reach US$0.73 per share.
The Group’s capital position also
strengthened with the core tier 1 ratio, the
ratio most favoured by regulators as it
comprises equity capital after regulatory
adjustments and deductions, increasing from 9.4
per cent to 10.5 per cent, largely due to profit
retention throughout the year.
As a consequence of this strong capital
generation, together with greater clarity on the
direction of regulatory reform of capital
requirements and an improving economic backdrop
in the developed world – particularly in
the United States – the Board has approved
increases in both the final dividend payment in
respect of 2010 and the planned quarterly
dividends for 2011. The final dividend for 2010,
payable on 5 May 2011 to shareholders on the
register on 17 March 2011, will be 12 cents per
ordinary share, up from 10 cents at the same
point last year. For the remainder of 2011, we
plan to pay quarterly dividends of nine cents
for each of the first three quarters compared
with eight cents in respect of the equivalent
quarters of 2010.
We enter 2011 with a new leadership team, but
only in the sense of changed roles. Everyone has
worked together over many years and there is
immense experience to draw on both from within
HSBC and from earlier careers at peer
organisations. Stuart Gulliver is leading the
management team as Group Chief Executive. His
clear objective is to deliver sustainable
long-term value for shareholders consistently in
a manner that maintains the confidence of all
other key stakeholders in our businesses
including depositors, counterparties, long-term
creditors, customers, employees, regulators and
governments. His review gives an insight into his immediate priorities.
Everything we do is governed by the imperative
of upholding HSBC’s corporate reputation
and character at the highest level and adding
further strength to our brand; we deeply regret
that a number of weaknesses in regulatory
compliance were highlighted in 2010 and we are
resolved to remedy these and reinforce the high
standards we demand of ourselves.
For my part, I shall be focusing on engaging at
the highest level in the regulatory reform
debates that will, in large part, shape our
future. I shall also lead the Board in the
stewardship and review of performance of our
financial and human resources.
In the interest of full transparency, we have
today published on our website the respective
roles and responsibilities of the Group
Chairman, the Deputy Chairman and Senior
Independent Director and the Group Chief
Executive.
I have already paid tribute to the contributions
of Stephen Green and Michael Geoghegan. Vincent
Cheng has indicated that he will step down at
the next AGM and, on behalf of the Board, I want
to thank him for his immense contribution in
many roles over 33 years. Vincent will retain an
association with the Group by taking on an
advisory role to the Group Chief Executive on
regional matters. Laura Cha will join the Board
on 1 March; Laura has been Deputy Chair of The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Limited for four years and brings a wealth of
experience of China; fuller details of her
background and experience are set out in Our Board section.
There was much progress made during 2010 on the
regulatory reform agenda. Although there is
still a great deal to do, the shape of capital
requirements was broadly clarified and an
implementation timetable stretching out to 2019
was agreed to allow time for the industry to
adjust progressively. A minimum common equity
tier 1 ratio of 7 per cent, including a capital
conservation buffer, has been agreed. HSBC
already meets this threshold requirement. The
‘Group Chief Executive’s Business
Review’ addresses how these revised
requirements will impact our targeted return on
equity.
During 2011, the debate will be dominated by
consideration of the calibration of minimum
liquidity standards. Although it is clear that
liquidity and funding weaknesses were key
elements contributing to the crisis, HSBC agrees
with the industry consensus that the revised requirements in these
areas are overly conservative and could lead to
unnecessary deleveraging at a time of fragile
economic recovery in much of the developed
world. It will be a near impossibility for the
industry to expand business lending at the same
time as increasing the amount of deposits
deployed in government bonds while, for many
banks but not HSBC, reducing dependency on
central bank liquidity support arrangements. It
is to be hoped that the observation period,
which starts this year and precedes the formal
introduction of the new requirements, will
inform a recalibration of these minimum
liquidity standards.
A second debate of importance to HSBC’s
shareholders in 2011 will concern the
designation of ‘Systemically Important
Financial Institutions’ (SIFIs).
Consideration is being given in the regulatory
community to mandating higher capital
requirements, together with more intense
supervision, for institutions classified as
SIFIs. We agree with heightened supervision but
it is not clear that the reduced shareholder
returns that would follow the imposition of
incremental capital would be compensated for by
improved stability. Classification as a SIFI
with a requirement to hold incremental capital
would, however, probably lead others to favour
SIFIs as counterparties, and may therefore have
the unintended consequence of further
concentrating the industry.
HSBC’s position is that systemic
importance should not be determined by size
alone. It is clear, however, that, on almost any
basis, HSBC would be classified as systemically
important. For this reason we are engaging fully
in the debate around the consequences of
designation as a SIFI. In particular, we draw
attention to the benefits of our corporate
organisation through separate subsidiaries in
mitigation against the imposition of incremental
capital for SIFIs based on size alone.
In October 2010, the UK government confirmed its
intention to raise the sum of £2.5 billion
(US$3.9 billion) through a levy on bank balance
sheets, and recently announced it will
accelerate the full impact of this levy to 2011.
We take no issue with the right of the UK
government to raise a levy on the banking
industry, particularly when having had to risk
taxpayers’ money to rescue a number of
important UK institutions. However, as the
proposed levy is to be applied to the
consolidated balance sheet, it applies beyond
the legal boundary of the domestic institution
to include overseas operations conducted through
separately capitalised subsidiaries. This
therefore constitutes an additional cost of
basing a growing multinational banking group in
the UK.
We intend to clarify in each set of results
going forward the impact of the levy, split
between UK and overseas operations, and Stuart
Gulliver covers this in more detail in his
review. We regard the levy, which is not tax
deductible, as akin to a distribution of
profits. For this reason, we intend to add to
future shareholder dividends that would
otherwise be paid, any amount saved in the event
that the levy is restructured or relieved in due
course.
“Our duty to shareholders is to build
sustainable value in the economic and competitive
environment in which we operate and our principal
resource for achieving this is
human talent.”
The recent crisis has caused a proper
introspection as to the role that banks play in
society and at HSBC we welcome this. Banking is
not simply about money. It is about helping
individuals and organisations within society to
meet personal and corporate objectives by
facilitating access to financial capital and
protecting value for those who make capital
available. Payment mechanisms, the provision of
long-term credit, trade finance, hedging and
other risk management products, deposit,
investment and retirement services are but a few
of the activities through which banking groups
contribute to today’s financial system.
Society cannot function without an effective
financial system that delivers value to those it
serves at an intermediation cost that is
proportionate to the value created. Somehow,
many participants and not just banks, lost sight
of this basic principle in the run-up to the
recent financial crisis and the consequences for
all have, inevitably, been far reaching. There
is no doubt that the scale of regulatory reform
will bring many challenges, but it will also
open new opportunities.
At HSBC, we shall not forget what happened to
precipitate the scale of reform now underway.
Although the financial turmoil arising from the
events of 2007-2008 has largely moderated, in
large part as a result of co-ordinated
government action and support to the financial
system, we enter 2011 with humility, ready to
apply right across HSBC all of the lessons
learned, notwithstanding that HSBC itself
neither sought nor received support from any
government.
Society has a right to ask if banks ‘get
it’. At HSBC, we do – and we are
focused on embedding the necessary changes in
our business model for long-term sustainable
value creation. But we also do not forget that
value creation depends upon HSBC recruiting,
training and retaining the right talent in order
to manage the risks we accept through
intermediating customer flows; design solutions
to address complex financial problems; build
enduring relationships with core customers;
build confidence in the Group’s financial
strength; and create the strategic options that
offer the next generation fresh opportunities to
continue building sustainable value.
In this globalised world, there is intense
competition for the best people and, given our
long history within and connections into the
faster-growing developing markets, our best
people are highly marketable. It would be
irresponsible to allow our comparative
advantages to wither by ignoring the market
forces that exist around compensation, even
though we understand how sensitive this subject
is. Reform in this area can only be achieved if
there is concerted international agreement on
limiting the quantum of pay as well as
harmonising pay structures but there appears to
be no appetite to take the initiative on this.
Our duty to shareholders is to build sustainable
value in the economic and competitive
environment in which we operate and our
principal resource for achieving this is human
talent. Under the governance of the Board, we
will continue to operate and apply remuneration
policies and practices that take full
recognition of best practice and are aligned
with the long-term interests of
shareholders.
Finally, I want to pay tribute to my 307,000
colleagues. So many of HSBC’s people have
exemplified commitment and endeavour again in
2010, helping our customers and clients to meet
their financial objectives while taking on the
additional burden of preparing for regulatory
change. This has been done against a backdrop of
continuing broad-based fiscal support to many
economies, with public opinion consistently and
highly critical of our industry. As I look
forward, it is the combination of the
capabilities of HSBC’s people, their
determination to do the right thing for our
customers and their deep sense of responsibility
to the communities they serve that makes me
confident that HSBC will play a leading role in
rebuilding the trust that our industry has lost
and, by doing so, will build sustainable value
for you, our shareholders.