Key Performance Indicators

Monitoring our performance

The Board of Directors and the Group Management Board, which operates as a general management committee under the direct authority of the Board, monitor HSBC's progress against its strategic objectives. Progress is assessed by comparison with our strategy, our operating plan targets and our historical performance, using both financial and non-financial measures. We have seven financial and three non-financial key performance indicators.

Open Strategic objective: deliver consistent earnings and superior risk-adjusted returns
Risk-adjusted revenue growth
Basic earnings per ordinary share
Dividends per share growth
Close Strategic objective: deliver consistent earnings and superior risk-adjusted returns
Risk-adjusted revenue growth
Basic earnings per ordinary share
Dividends per share growth

Risk-adjusted revenue growth (%)
(2010: underlying revenue
growth 15%)

Five year bar chart showing Risk-adjusted revenue growth from 2006 to 2010 as a percentage. In 2010 risk-adjusted revenue growth was 15 per cent.

Measure: percentage increase in reported net operating income after loan impairment and other credit risk charges since last year.

Target: to deliver consistent growth in risk-adjusted revenues.

Outcome: reported risk-adjusted revenue increased, primarily due to a reversal of adverse movements in prior years on the fair value of own debt designated at fair value and lower loan impairment charges. The latter also drove the increase in underlying revenue.

Basic earnings per ordinary share
(US cents)

Five year bar chart showing basic earnings per ordinary share from 2006 to 2010 in US cents. In 2010 basic earnings per ordinary share were 73 US cents.

Measure: level of basic earnings generated per ordinary share.

Target: to deliver consistent growth in basic earnings per share.

Outcome: earnings per share increased in 2010, reflecting significantly lower adverse movements on the fair value of own debt due to credit spreads and lower loan impairment charges, which resulted in an increase in reported profit.

Dividends per share growth (%)

Five year bar chart showing dividends per share growth from 2006 to 2010 as a percentage. In 2010 dividends per share growth was 5.9 per cent.

Measure: percentage increase in dividends per share since last year, based on dividends paid in respect of the year to which the dividend relates.

Target: to deliver sustained dividend per share growth.

Outcome: dividends per share increased by 5.9%.

Open Strategic objective: enhance efficiency using economies of scale
Cost efficiency
Close Strategic objective: enhance efficiency using economies of scale
Cost efficiency

Cost efficiency (%)

Five year bar chart showing cost efficiency from 2006 to 2010 as a percentage. In 2010 cost efficiency was 55.2 per cent.

Measure: (percentage) total operating expenses divided by net operating income before loan impairment and other credit risk provisions.

Target: to be between 48% and 52%, a range within which business is expected to remain to accommodate both returns to shareholders and the need for continued investment in support of future business growth.

Outcome: the ratio was outside the target range, in part due to one-off costs, but also increased investment in operational infrastructure and strategic initiatives.

Open Strategic objective: motivate staff to deliver strategy
Employee engagement
Close Strategic objective: motivate staff to deliver strategy
Employee engagement

Employee engagement (%)

Four year bar chart showing employee engagement from 2007 to 2010 as a percentage, broken into Global best in class, Financial services average and HSBC actual.
  • Global best in class
  • Financial services average
  • HSBC (actual)

Measure: percentage measure of employee’s emotional and rational attachment to HSBC, a combination of advocacy, satisfaction, commitment and pride.

Target: to achieve a 72% global rating in 2010, with progressive improvement to best in class by 2011.

Outcome: 68%, mirroring the fall in global best in class but remaining well above the financial services average.

Open Strategic objective: maintain capital strength and strong liquidity
Return on average total shareholders’ equity
Tier 1 capital
Advances to core funding ratio
Close Strategic objective: maintain capital strength and strong liquidity
Return on average total shareholders’ equity
Tier 1 capital
Advances to core funding ratio

Return on average total shareholders’ equity (%)

Five year bar chart showing return on average total shareholders’ equity from 2006 to 2010 as a percentage. In 2010 return on average total shareholders’ equity was 9.5 per cent.

Measure: (percentage) profit attributable to shareholders divided by average total shareholders’ equity.

Target: to maintain a return in the medium term of between 15% and 19%. In 2011, we intend to replace the target with one in the 12% to 15% range over the normal cycle.

Outcome: return on equity was below the target range, but 4.4 percentage points higher than in 2009.

Tier 1 capital (%)

Five year bar chart showing tier 1 capital from 2006 to 2010 as a percentage. In 2010 tier 1 capital was 12.1 per cent.

Measure: component of regulatory capital comprising core tier 1 and other tier 1 capital.

Target: to maintain a strong capital base to support the development of the business and meet regulatory capital requirements at all times.

Outcome: the increase in tier 1 capital to 12.1% reflected the contribution of profit to capital, the issue of hybrid capital securities during the year, and careful management of risk-weighted assets.

Advances to core funding ratio (%)

Bar chart showing advances to core funding ratio as a percentage from 2009 and 2010.
  • 2009
  • 2010

Measure: current loans and advances to customers as a percentage of the total of core customer deposits and term funding with a remaining term to maturity in excess of one year.

Target: to maintain an advances to core funding ratio below limits set for each entity.

Outcome: ratio within the limits set by the Risk Management Meeting for each site.

Open Strategic objective: reach new customers and expand services to existing customers using the HSBC brand and global network
Brand perception
Customer recommendation
Close Strategic objective: reach new customers and expand services to existing customers using the HSBC brand and global network
Brand perception
Customer recommendation

Brand perception

Three year bar charts showing brand perception for Personal Financial Services and Business Banking from 2008, 2009 and 2010. Shows the industry average, target, and HSBC performance.
  • 0Industry average
  • Target
  • HSBC performance

Measure: an independent survey of brands around the world which judges their relative strength. The results are used to form a brand perception index, where the industry average is zero.

Target: to meet or exceed targets based on performance against key competitors and the industry average.

Outcome: Personal Financial Services and Business Banking customers judged HSBC’s brand to be six points stronger than the competitor average. Our ratings met or exceeded our targets in 2010.

Customer recommendation

Three year bar charts showing customer recommendation from 2008, 2009 and 2010. Shows the industry average, target and HSBC performance.
  • 0Industry average
  • Target
  • HSBC performance

Measure: an independent survey of customers in up to 15 countries which judges how likely they are to recommend a particular brand. The results are used to create a customer recommendation index, where the industry average is zero.

Target: to meet or exceed targets based on performance against key competitors and the industry average.

Outcome: Business Banking exceeded its target. Personal Financial Services fell short of its challenging target, but remained well above the competitor average.

  • See our Annual Report and Accounts 2010, page 11 for more background information.